Timeline for Психолингвистика - tag removal or (at least) strict redifinition request
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 at 21:04 | comment | added | Manjusri | This site about Russian language is a bore. | |
| Feb 10, 2013 at 15:56 | comment | added | theUg | 1) Declaring something (as you do with a lot of things) self-evident, including clearly subjective experiences, — now, that is rigidity. Mayhaps, you are yet to learn the value of healthy scepticism, although you seem to be quite at home on another extreme: philosophical one. 2) If you would look at Linguistics.SE more thoroughly, you would see that questions that use this tag actually relate to it, not just slap it on for no reason. And that is exactly what we are talking about. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 20:52 | comment | added | Manjusri | I mean I don't value experience(s) much, since if all the people were doing only the things the other people do we were sitting in caves dressed in animal skins. But perhaps noticing that there are some psycholinguistical questions o Linguistics SE might make the opponents to use their mental skills. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 20:47 | comment | added | Manjusri | Oh, BTW: linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/… | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 20:17 | comment | added | Manjusri | And someone's personal whims have nothing to do with laws or even with rules of this site. I think it takes too much efforts to remain calm here. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 20:13 | comment | added | Manjusri | Demaning a proof of a self-evident statement is indeed a rigidity of thought. | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 1:51 | comment | added | theUg | Demanding a proof of a statement is not a rigidity of thought. When you are going to say next that St. Thomas Anselm is a famous Russian horticulturist, am I expected to believe you, just because it is “your way of expressing yourself”? | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 19:04 | comment | added | Manjusri | I just cannot believe someone can really be so rigid in thoughts. | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 18:48 | comment | added | Manjusri | ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 16:10 | comment | added | theUg | @shabunc Or the fact that questions so tagged make no connection to that branch of linguistics. | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 13:51 | comment | added | shabunc Mod | The fact that something has not been used is by itself no indicator of anything, but the fact that on MANY language SE services theres nothing like 'psycholinguistical' questions provoke some thoughts. | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 13:47 | history | answered | Manjusri | CC BY-SA 3.0 |